Scoping rules for Javascript can create unexpected impacts with loops and closuresSo consider this problem. Let’s say you are constructing a menu and you need to set up some onclick events for the items in the menu.
...
So this is how one might set things up from first principles:
Code Block | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
// Set up an array of items.
var MENUitems = ["Company", "Product", "History", "Contact"];
var H = '';
for (var i=0; i < MENUitems.length; i++) {
H+= "<div class='MENUitem'>" + MENUitems[i] + "</div>"
}
document.body.innerHTML = H; |
And you might have some light styling:
Code Block | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
.MENUitem {
display: inline-block;
padding: 5px;
border: gray solid;
margin: 2px;
} |
Then you set up some onclick handlers…
Code Block | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
var MENUdom = document.querySelectorAll(".MENUitem"); // Get a NodeList
for (var i=0; i < MENUitems.length; i++) {
MENUdom[i].onclick = function(E){ console.log("Clicked " + MENUitems[i]);}
} |
But oh crap.
It’s doesn’t work as expected. Instead of forming a closure with the value i being 0, 1, 2 and 3, all the functions get the value of i defined as it is at the end of the loop - namely 4. And so we end up with:
Code Block |
---|
Clicked undefined |
A fix for this is to use a special keyword which is “let” instead of var. So you do this instead:
Code Block | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
for (let i=0; i < MENUitems.length; i++) {
MENUdom[i].onclick = function(E){ console.log("Clicked " + MENUitems[i]);}
} |
It’s kind of hacky workaround a language flaw in Javascript. Using the let keyword isn’t the only way to solve this problem. There are other workarounds possible. Read this article:
https://davidyoung.tech/loops-closures-and-ajax
For some other good ideas on how to solve this problem.
This video also touches on the concept of NodeList objects.